Conventions

When you no longer is

you lose your isness but only

for a second since after that

mathematical point

of overlap—and transition from

are- is in a world of “thingness”

to aintness—the acetate runs_

 Then…you can speak only

“in” the shrinking down to

a miniscule point of theoretical

dot of wasness of between

are and Isn’t comes

“nolonger” which

is really just a mystification

of “thevoid” (which itself doesn’t

separate from its qualifying article

as there is no “the” in thevoid

just_ ) as you isn’t and therefore

need not speak in terms of was’s or

hasn’t since you aint is or are anyway;

so, now nothing “isn’t”a word

or a place,

just a step

off the precipice

of_is,

not “into”

any”thing”

but off of_ …

which like space itself

is the medium which makes is

tangible as isness and the youness which emerges

from its belly—like a flower that begins to wilt from

the very moment of its conception until it hangs lifeless

at the point at which the transition to isn’t occurs at some

abstract future date—ride the eternal­_, which is neither_ or_, but only_,

the way a continent rides along the subduction zone of a geological plate,

until their invariable slide-under into notness…